Teaching Speaking
Developing Speaking Activities
Traditional classroom speaking
practice often takes the form of drills in which one person asks a question and
another gives an answer. The question and the answer are structured and
predictable, and often there is only one correct, predetermined answer. The
purpose of asking and answering the question is to demonstrate the ability to
ask and answer the question.
In contrast, the purpose of real
communication is to accomplish a task, such as conveying a telephone message,
obtaining information, or expressing an opinion. In real communication,
participants must manage uncertainty about what the other person will say.
Authentic communication involves an information gap; each participant has
information that the other does not have. In addition, to achieve their
purpose, participants may have to clarify their meaning or ask for confirmation
of their own understanding.
To create classroom speaking
activities that will develop communicative competence, instructors need to
incorporate a purpose and an information gap and allow for multiple forms of
expression. However, quantity alone will not necessarily produce competent
speakers. Instructors need to combine structured output activities, which allow
for error correction and increased accuracy, with communicative output
activities that give students opportunities to practice language use more
freely.
Structured Output Activities
Two common kinds of structured
output activities are information gap and jigsaw activities. In
both these types of activities, students complete a task by obtaining missing
information, a feature the activities have in common with real communication.
However, information gap and jigsaw activities also set up practice on specific
items of language. In this respect they are more like drills than like
communication.
Information Gap Activities
- Filling the gaps in a schedule or timetable: Partner A
holds an airline timetable with some of the arrival and departure times
missing. Partner B has the same timetable but with different blank spaces.
The two partners are not permitted to see each other's timetables and must
fill in the blanks by asking each other appropriate questions. The
features of language that are practiced would include questions beginning
with "when" or "at what time." Answers would be
limited mostly to time expressions like "at 8:15" or "at
ten in the evening."
- Completing the picture: The two partners have similar
pictures, each with different missing details, and they cooperate to find
all the missing details. In another variation, no items are missing, but
similar items differ in appearance. For example, in one picture, a man
walking along the street may be wearing an overcoat, while in the other
the man is wearing a jacket. The features of grammar and vocabulary that
are practiced are determined by the content of the pictures and the items
that are missing or different. Differences in the activities depicted lead
to practice of different verbs. Differences in number, size, and shape
lead to adjective practice. Differing locations would probably be
described with prepositional phrases.
These activities may be set up so
that the partners must practice more than just grammatical and lexical
features. For example, the timetable activity gains a social dimension when one
partner assumes the role of a student trying to make an appointment with a
partner who takes the role of a professor. Each partner has pages from an
appointment book in which certain dates and times are already filled in and
other times are still available for an appointment. Of course, the open times
don't match exactly, so there must be some polite negotiation to arrive at a
mutually convenient time for a meeting or a conference.
Jigsaw Activities
Jigsaw activities are more elaborate
information gap activities that can be done with several partners. In a jigsaw
activity, each partner has one or a few pieces of the "puzzle," and
the partners must cooperate to fit all the pieces into a whole picture. The
puzzle piece may take one of several forms. It may be one panel from a comic
strip or one photo from a set that tells a story. It may be one sentence from a
written narrative. It may be a tape recording of a conversation, in which case
no two partners hear exactly the same conversation.
- In one fairly simple jigsaw activity, students work in
groups of four. Each student in the group receives one panel from a comic
strip. Partners may not show each other their panels. Together the four
panels present this narrative: a man takes a container of ice cream from
the freezer; he serves himself several scoops of ice cream; he sits in
front of the TV eating his ice cream; he returns with the empty bowl to
the kitchen and finds that he left the container of ice cream, now
melting, on the kitchen counter. These pictures have a clear narrative
line and the partners are not likely to disagree about the appropriate
sequencing. You can make the task more demanding, however, by using
pictures that lend themselves to alternative sequences, so that the
partners have to negotiate among themselves to agree on a satisfactory
sequence.
- More elaborate jigsaws may proceed in two stages.
Students first work in input groups (groups A, B, C, and D) to receive
information. Each group receives a different part of the total information
for the task. Students then reorganize into groups of four with one
student each from A, B, C, and D, and use the information they received to
complete the task. Such an organization could be used, for example, when
the input is given in the form of a tape recording. Groups A, B, C, and D
each hear a different recording of a short news bulletin. The four
recordings all contain the same general information, but each has one or
more details that the others do not. In the second stage, students
reconstruct the complete story by comparing the four versions.
With information gap and jigsaw
activities, instructors need to be conscious of the language demands they place
on their students. If an activity calls for language your students have not
already practiced, you can brainstorm with them when setting up the activity to
preview the language they will need, eliciting what they already know and
supplementing what they are able to produce themselves.
Structured output activities can
form an effective bridge between instructor modeling and communicative output
because they are partly authentic and partly artificial. Like authentic
communication, they feature information gaps that must be bridged for
successful completion of the task. However, where authentic communication allows
speakers to use all of the language they know, structured output activities
lead students to practice specific features of language and to practice only in
brief sentences, not in extended discourse. Also, structured output situations
are contrived and more like games than real communication, and the
participants' social roles are irrelevant to the performance of the activity.
This structure controls the number of variables that students must deal with
when they are first exposed to new material. As they become comfortable, they
can move on to true communicative output activities.
Communicative Output Activities
Communicative output activities
allow students to practice using all of the language they know in situations
that resemble real settings. In these activities, students must work together
to develop a plan, resolve a problem, or complete a task. The most common types
of communicative output activity are role plays and discussions .
In role plays, students are assigned
roles and put into situations that they may eventually encounter outside the
classroom. Because role plays imitate life, the range of language functions
that may be used expands considerably. Also, the role relationships among the
students as they play their parts call for them to practice and develop their
sociolinguistic competence. They have to use language that is appropriate to
the situation and to the characters.
Students usually find role playing
enjoyable, but students who lack self-confidence or have lower proficiency
levels may find them intimidating at first. To succeed with role plays:
- Prepare carefully: Introduce the activity by describing
the situation and making sure that all of the students understand it
- Set a goal or outcome: Be sure the students understand
what the product of the role play should be, whether a plan, a schedule, a
group opinion, or some other product
- Use role cards: Give each student a card that describes
the person or role to be played. For lower-level students, the cards can
include words or expressions that that person might use.
- Brainstorm: Before you start the role play, have
students brainstorm as a class to predict what vocabulary, grammar, and
idiomatic expressions they might use.
- Keep groups small: Less-confident students will feel
more able to participate if they do not have to compete with many voices.
- Give students time to prepare: Let them work
individually to outline their ideas and the language they will need to
express them.
- Be present as a resource, not a monitor: Stay in
communicative mode to answer students' questions. Do not correct their
pronunciation or grammar unless they specifically ask you about it.
- Allow students to work at their own levels: Each
student has individual language skills, an individual approach to working
in groups, and a specific role to play in the activity. Do not expect all
students to contribute equally to the discussion, or to use every grammar
point you have taught.
- Do topical follow-up: Have students report to the class
on the outcome of their role plays.
- Do linguistic follow-up: After the role play is over,
give feedback on grammar or pronunciation problems you have heard. This
can wait until another class period when you plan to review pronunciation
or grammar anyway.
Discussions, like role plays,
succeed when the instructor prepares students first, and then gets out of the
way. To succeed with discussions:
- Prepare the students: Give them input (both topical
information and language forms) so that they will have something to say
and the language with which to say it.
- Offer choices: Let students suggest the topic for
discussion or choose from several options. Discussion does not always have
to be about serious issues. Students are likely to be more motivated to
participate if the topic is television programs, plans for a vacation, or
news about mutual friends. Weighty topics like how to combat pollution are
not as engaging and place heavy demands on students' linguistic
competence.
- Set a goal or outcome: This can be a group product,
such as a letter to the editor, or individual reports on the views of
others in the group.
- Use small groups instead of whole-class discussion:
Large groups can make participation difficult.
- Keep it short: Give students a defined period of time,
not more than 8-10 minutes, for discussion. Allow them to stop sooner if
they run out of things to say.
- Allow students to participate in their own way: Not
every student will feel comfortable talking about every topic. Do not
expect all of them to contribute equally to the conversation.
- Do topical follow-up: Have students report to the class
on the results of their discussion.
- Do linguistic follow-up: After the discussion is over,
give feedback on grammar or pronunciation problems you have heard. This
can wait until another class period when you plan to review pronunciation
or grammar anyway.
Through well-prepared communicative
output activities such as role plays and discussions, you can encourage
students to experiment and innovate with the language, and create a supportive
atmosphere that allows them to make mistakes without fear of embarrassment.
This will contribute to their self-confidence as speakers and to their
motivation to learn more.